This is a welcome shift in public dialogue, away from a debate over the merits of pre-k for improved academic outcomes, child health, and other benefits, and toward a discussion of how we’re going to fulfill our commitment to educational opportunity for our kids.
As reported by Early Ed Watch:
…participating in just the pre-k program had significant positive impacts on high school completion and also reduced special education placements and grade retention. In other words, the…pre-k intervention had some positive impacts even when children didn’t receive sustained elementary supports.
But the greatest benefits were for youngsters who participated in both the pre-k and the school-age interventions. Particularly important, students who participated in the full intervention had higher test scores at age 17–something that wasn’t true for the other groups.
|Intervention||Impacts (relative to comparison group)||Benefit to Society per $ Invested|
|Preschool only||Increased high school completion
Reduced special education placement
Reduced grade retention
|School-age only||Reduced grade retention and special education placements||$1.42|
|Preschool and school age||Reduced grade retention and special education placements
Higher achievement test scores (age 17)
More To Read
September 28, 2023
To understand the needs and priorities of our state’s different regions, EOI is listening to the people and communities most impacted by our policy priorities.
September 12, 2023
Except billionaires. And even they lose.
September 6, 2023
Thanks to the work of advocates, thousands of Washington workers are already getting a better deal at work