San Francisco adopted paid sick leave legislation in 2006, followed by Washington, DC, Connecticut, and Seattle. In 2013, Portland, OR, New York City, Jersey City, and SeaTac passed new laws entitling workers to paid sick leave and Washington, DC’s council expanded coverage. Protecting public health, assuring that sick children receive care and prompt medical attention, and rebuilding family economic security have motivated voters and policymakers to support Paid Sick Days.
Multiple studies of firms that voluntarily provide paid leave have also found that sick leave benefits businesses through higher morale and productivity and lower rates of turnover.1 Nevertheless, some have argued that requiring employers to provide sick leave could hurt economic and job growth.
Studies of sick leave laws to date show that covered economies are equaling or out-performing nearby communities; the laws have had small to no impact on business costs, hiring, or location decisions; and that workers are benefiting with more access to paid leave and better ability to care for their own and their families’ health needs.
Washington Paid Sick & Safe Leave Proposal
- Allows employees to earn 5 to 9 days of paid sick and safe leave, depending on employer size
- Modeled after Seattle’s succesful paid sick days law
- Benefits 1 million Washington workers – or one-third of the state’s workforce – who have no access to paid sick leave
More To Read
September 6, 2024
Tax Loopholes for Big Tech Are Costing Washington Families
Subsidies for big corporations in our tax code come at a cost for college students and their families
July 31, 2024
News from the Road: EOI’s summer policy road trip continues
We're working to understand the issues that matter to Washingtonians
July 31, 2024
New poll in Washington finds people struggling with health care costs at an alarming rate
More than half (57%) of respondents have avoided seeking medical treatment or modified their use of prescriptions in the last year due to the cost