Building an Economy that Works for Everyone

We all lose by leaving health insurance to the market’s whims

The national discussion about health care is undergoing the lobbyists’ metamorphism.  All during the Presidential campaign, the run-up to the inauguration, and the first months of President Obama’s administration, the focus was on universal health coverage.  But in the past two months, it has switched to making sure that private insurance is not undercut by a public program.

It is ironic that we are told to think of health care as a market good, but we are urged to not allow a competitor – the government – which most likely has a more efficient and better product.  We are not protecting the market in health care, we are protecting the cartels of the health care industry, from the for-profit insurance companies to the big corporate pharmaceutical companies, to health care providers themselves.

We won’t get to universal coverage coverage if we don’t challenge the status quo organization and delivery of health care.  After all, it is this status quo that has only diminished private coverage over the past twenty years.

But perhaps we need to step back even further in considering health care.  We’ve been getting into trouble ever since we started to consider it a “market” good.  It is not a commodity, like a flat screen TV.  You don’t choose to have Crohn’s disease, like my son, or breast cancer, like my colleague, or to just get old and start to fall apart, like my Dad.  Those are not market commodities.

People don’t consume broken arms, or colonoscopies, or skin cancer.  But once we consider people to be consumers of health care, and health care to be a commodity on the market, we have corrupted the moral dictums of the medical profession, in which the health of the patient should be the first consideration, and doctors consecrate their lives to the service of humanity.  The impulse for health care reform will fail if it centers around “show me the money”.

The national discussion about health care is undergoing the lobbyists’ metamorphism.  All during the Presidential campaign, the run-up to the inauguration, and the first months of President Obama’s administration, the focus was on universal health coverage.  But in the past two months, it has switched to making sure that private insurance is not undercut by a public program.  It is ironic that we are told to think of health care as a market good, but we are urged to not allow a competitor – the government – which most likely has a more efficient and better product.  We are not protecting the market in health care, we are protecting the cartels of the health care industry, from the for-profit insurance companies to the big corporate pharmaceutical companies, to health care providers themselves.

We won’t get to universal coverage coverage if we don’t challenge the status quo organization and delivery of health care.  After all, it is this status quo that has only diminished private coverage over the past twenty years.

But perhaps we need to step back even further in considering health care.  We’ve been getting into trouble ever since we started to consider it a “market” good.  It is not a commodity, like a flat screen TV.  You don’t choose to have Crohn’s disease, like my son, or breast cancer, like my colleague, or to just get old and start to fall apart, like my Dad.  Those are not market commodities.  People don’t consume broken arms, or colonoscopies, or skin cancer.  But once we consider people to be consumers of health care, and health care to be a commodity on the market, we have corrupted the moral dictums of the medical profession, in which the health of the patient should be the first consideration, and doctors consecrate their lives to the service of humanity.  The impulse for health care reform will fail if it centers around “show me the money”.

  • Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More To Read

February 22, 2024

Why Is Health Care Declining in Washington? Look to Hospital Consolidation

People are hurting in our state. And it’s no accident.

February 2, 2024

What is REET and Why Do We Need to Reform It?

Washington State lawmakers have the chance to make a progressive tax more progressive and provide a permanent funding source for affordable housing

January 23, 2024

Report: Washington no longer has the most regressive tax structure in the nation

This is both cause for celebration and a call to action