Building an Economy that Works for Everyone

WA Supreme Court brings majority rule back to legislature

2013 Washington Supreme Court justices

The 2013 Washington Supreme Court: Justices Owens wrote for the majority with justices Chambers, Fairhurst, Madsen, Wiggins, and Gonzalez concurring. Justice C. Johnson wrote a dissent signed on by Justices Stephens and J.Johnson, while Justice J.Johnson wrote a separate dissent.

In a 6-3 decision this morning, the Washington State Supreme Court struck down the rule requiring a supermajority (two-thirds) vote of the legislature to pass taxes or close tax loopholes.

The court found the measure, long backed by initiative promoter Tim Eyman, violates the state constitution’s “plain language” that “prohibits either the people or the legislature from passing legislation requiring more than a simple majority for the passage of tax legislation.”

Right now, Publicola has the clearest summary of the ruling, and a link to the actual decision. Also: don’t miss Sightline’s great work uncovering the connections between Tim Eyman, Big Oil, and the (now unconstitutional) 2/3rds rule.

Stay tuned for further updates – when I see a good analysis of the ruling and/or its implications, I’ll get it posted pronto.

  • Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More To Read

February 22, 2024

Why Is Health Care Declining in Washington? Look to Hospital Consolidation

People are hurting in our state. And it’s no accident.

February 2, 2024

What is REET and Why Do We Need to Reform It?

Washington State lawmakers have the chance to make a progressive tax more progressive and provide a permanent funding source for affordable housing

January 23, 2024

Report: Washington no longer has the most regressive tax structure in the nation

This is both cause for celebration and a call to action