Washington State’s seventy year-old tax structure is built on an ever-shrinking base, and taxes fall most heavily on those least able to afford them. This discussion brief outlines options for a limited tax on the highest income households, coupled with a reduction in sales or property tax. The result would be a fairer tax system that keeps pace with economic growth and provides the revenues for high-priority public investments in education and infrastructure that are necessary for shared prosperity.
Our state’s existing tax system is outdated and unfair.
- Washington’s tax system falls most heavily on low- and moderate-income residents and smaller businesses, while the state’s wealthiest residents pay relatively little for public services.
- By failing to capture revenue from a changing economy, we are starving our state of needed investments in education, transportation, and health.
A tax on high incomes will raise revenue that grows with our economy.
- A tax on incomes over $200,000 would fall on the top 4% of households. It would raise $2 billion per biennium at 3%, and $3.4 billion at 5%.
- A “millionaires” tax would be paid by 0.1% of households. It would raise $780 million per biennium at 3%, and $1.3 billion at 5%.
- A tax on interest, dividend, and capital gains income with middle class and senior exclusions would raise up to $1.9 billion.
New progressive taxes paired with reductions in regressive taxes will reduce inequities in our state’s tax structure.
- Pairing new progressive taxes with reductions in regressive taxes could net $400-$760 million each biennium.
- Lowering the state portion of the sales tax from 6.5% to 6% would cost $1.3 billion a biennium and save the typical Washington family $60 per year.
- Cutting the state portion of the property tax in half would cost $1.5 billion a biennium and save the average homeowner $330 annually.
More To Read
February 15, 2019
Early childhood educators make much less than K-12 teachers, and are twice as likely to be Hispanic
February 7, 2019
HB 1696 and SB 5090 prohibit screening job applicants based on income history