The case for expanding Social Security, not cutting it

Via the Washington Post Wonkblog:

Nowadays, whenever Social Security comes up in policy debates around Washington, the discussion often focuses on how best to cut benefits in order to shore up the program’s finances.

But a big new report (pdf) from the New America Foundation suggests that the conventional wisdom is exactly backward. Congress should be looking at ways to expand Social Security, not shrink it — particularly at a time when traditional corporate pensions are disappearing, and 401(k)s have proved fairly risky.

The major proposal in the report is to add a brand new benefit to Social Security, called Part B, which would provide a flat $11,699 per year to all retired workers. This would come on top of regular Social Security, which would also be protected from any further cuts.

The net effect is that the new Social Security program would replace a far bigger chunk of a worker’s lifetime earnings than the current program does. Kevin Drum offers up this chart:

social-security-part-b

Read more from the Washington Post >

  • Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More To Read

November 16, 2018

Without Amazon’s interference, San Francisco taxes big business

Two cities struggle to fund homelessness relief. One succeeds.

November 14, 2018

What’s keeping wages down and driving inequality up in Washington

The State of Working Washington 2018: Part 3

November 9, 2018

7 Reforms To Strengthen Social Security

America’s Pension Plan Can Be Made Stronger Without Benefit Cuts