by Aubrey Davis
From the Seattle Times: TWENTY years ago, Washington created the Basic Health Plan (BHP) to provide reasonable health care for people who work for employers that do not offer them insurance and do not pay enough for them to afford to buy individual coverage on the market. The BHP is partly financed by income-adjusted premiums paid by participants, and since 2002, partly by a voter-approved tax on cigarettes.
Today, facing a massive revenue shortfall thanks to the recession, lawmakers are weighing whether to shut down the BHP entirely. The consequences of doing so were vividly described by Times reporter Carol Ostrom’s story [“Amid budget crisis, hard health-care decisions: Where to cut?” Jan 13]. The loss would not only threaten people’s health, but their very lives. And it would eliminate a program that will be fundamental for the state’s participation in national health-care reform in 2014.
The irony is that the BHP, while financed by direct-user payments and a voter-approved tax, faces closure. Meanwhile, our state is forgoing billions in tax revenue through hundreds of corporate tax loopholes and exemptions that voters never approved in the first place, and that haven’t been seriously re-examined since.
More To Read
March 20, 2024
I-2111: The Income Tax Ban Is A Spectacle, but One We Can’t Ignore
A way to waste time, energy, and money, I-2111 is costing more than just taxes
March 20, 2024
Let’s Go Washington: Three initiatives threatening to roll back years of progress
Here’s what you need to know about the initiatives on your November ballot
March 12, 2024
Washington’s Women Are More Protected This Equal Pay Day
Thanks to an update to the state's wage discrimination protections, Washington woman are closer to closing the wage gap